R&J Video

https://youtu.be/QST6NzhfiQA

We could feel better

I never believe someone will get in love because one slight. Those are childish words which only make things getting more complicated then it should be. Romeo was one of them, childish and arrogant. But although the I dislike him that much but I still understand what he did is reasonable for a 15 years child in the middle age Italy. We did love the story that two child get in love but the family become the block, we wish to believe that love is true and touchable in our life and we wish to believe we should find a love for ourselves. Those wishes makes us like the play and feels hopeful and look for a “true love” in our own life.

Act two was a famous act, maybe the most famous act in the whole book, the Cap family show their tolerance specially the lord Cap. He stopped his  nephew who wish to start some action that treats Romeo which makes him have a change to meet his "love". That remands me that I may forget the characters setting in the play, when I saw Romeo I place him into that Romeo that in my head who is clever wisdom and prudente. But in the book he is a 15 years child who acted as same as a 15 years child. He take the risk of his life sneak into Juliet's house and only want to see her again. I would say the risk is worth for him which improved their relationship and give them the change to moving on. But the action was danger and ungentle, which is illegal in now age and I assume that was also illeg

al at that time which will also makes the girl feel like you were watching her the whole day, but I shall never knew how Juliet love him.  

Juliet was more mature and clever then her love in the book, she is more like a teenage girl who was tied of all the social connect and only want to care about someone she loved. She also know her family will never let her be together with Romeo and she was also prepare for that. The only thing she did is spend sometime in her room and soliloquize the name of the people she liked. But if I was she I will be totally freak out when I find out he stand in my back and hear all this, and maybe I will turn to hate him. But there maybe right for Romeo, maybe only because they were the right people to each other so some ungentle ting happened is expectable. 

After all I may see them as our age or even older but they are only teenager child who was easy being controlled by their mod and temper. Lastly, in act two, Romeo and Juliet engaged by just seeing each other twice. Maybe I shall never understand or I was mistake, maybe for the right person, may be one sight means everything.

Love in 16 Century

Romeo and Juliet was a story that written by Shakespeare. This story seem like the most famous story that makes the whole world cry and regret for their death and also glade the two family which were once enemy become friend again. No matter the reader is a child or a old man, educated or not, when you ask them for a love story which ended in tragedy, Romeo and Juliet may the first one came into their head. When I was a kid it was the time that China propagandize about the freedom of marriage, they use this as an example to show why the child should abandon the prejudice about the family and simple find some they love. It seem like a perfect love story that the only regret is it was ended in a tragedy.

But things being different when I read this book deeper. Romeo is not some one who love in some because that they ever resemble or complementary, but only because he find Juliet is attractive. He is not that gentle and kind young man who was sentimentality. His though was so childish and naive that makes me hate. His reason of loving some one was only an excuess that may explain welly about his hormone impulse. When he get in love with Juliet I was speechless, I never know that he was thought every girl that he love was the “real love” of his entire life and he will give everything for her and after a “true love” ended he could find another “true love” just by one sight. He is an 15 years old boy who just awakening of love, and by that age he was so childish then most of character in this book, even his lover Juliet.

I never knew that Juliet was 13 and her react was so mature that makes I think she even older then me, expect that part she fall in love with Romeo marks that she was still a child. Only the student in the middle school will wrote love letters now, maybe this is not true but when people grow older they won’t show how knowledgeable they are and how instructed their language is, and the girls will like something which more realistic. Not like Romeo, Juliet was clear about the environment that she was in, she know she could not repire the relationship between two family and she know that was impossible that change her mother’s mind and made her agree that she should marry to someone else. She know the risk and consequence that she take and those things makes she become more mature then Romeo.

The book totally change the impression that I thought about the story and also teach what the world was in 16 century. Although I felt like my prejudice of Romeo was growing while I read the book but I still think this book was enjoyable to read as a play.

Briefly summarize 1.1 1.2

1.1 G and S two servwants of montage  talk about how they hate the other family. 

Montage and caplet was become fighting for a fight in the street. 

Romeo was in the town with his friend. 

They had argue and the argue become a fight   

2.1 

When Romeo interned he admit that he felt in love with a girl in caplet family to Benvolvo. 

 

The different between "Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time"'s play and novel

Frankly I read the novel first form my summer reading, which makes me very sure about I will know every thing about the play. Because at that time I thought the play was just the short cut of the novel.But I was wrong, in the novel I thought Christopher was just a strange boy who was only got an A in his math. At first I did not liked him, because his thoughtful was childish although he solve all the problem just by luck. I always some time he just make the things worse which makes me kind of want to replace him and finish the whole novel in about two pages. But I was wrong again, when the first time I read the play I find out that the Christopher in the play is not the same Christopher who I read in the novel, actually they are the same person, I thought that they were different because I read the novel as a third person who was already know everything and that person just reading a story in the play the author makes the characters back to move and I realized that all they do was logical at that time, what makes me feel board only because I know every thing before I read the novel.

I will say that the play is more interesting and readable, but a play is for performance which did not give enough details and information, maybe I felt that the play is good just because I read the novel first. Although the play was simple and do not have many details but it still sound like more alive then the book. The book was a diary like long story which was involved every one’s react and emotion, and the diary makes them all only alive in the diary. I feel like the novel was just telling a story as a old man who just been through all of stories. 

But the play bring them all alive. I can see Rojie dislike Christopher but still show his care and kind to him. Which was only feel lines describe form the diary.After I read both the play and the novel versions I feel like that  I prefer the play because I can first time become a third person instide of just a listener. 

The detail form the book is important though, the play just copy the story line but some time avoid detail which can only by notice form the light and the voice form the actor, not as clear as the words on the paper. Those detail may not noticed by Christopher but noticed by a reader which makes the reader think Christopher was childish. 

 The similarities and in the play and novel versions are seen by the difference form the details and how people understand them. Although they share the same story and give every character same personality but the play is more alive and the novel is more detailable and more meticulous.

Citation:

Haddon, Mark. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time. New York: Doubleday, 2003. Print.

Stephens, Simon. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time. New York: Dramatists Play Service, 2015. Prin

Shakespeare's theater vs today theater.

the language is totally different then today's language. 

An out side theatre. 

All male actor. 

With out any theological help. 

Even the male would play a female role

The only thing that audience heard would be the voice of those actors. 

Audience could stand in the front of stage. 

The theatre was always closed by the government.

The weather would effect a lot of a play. 

He wrote plays for loyal not for everyone.

People pretend where they are. 

More religious information then today. 

Directors were less important 

Some History which remain us about the different between L&P

“Literature, in its broadest sense, is any written work; etymologically the term derives from Latin litaritura/litteratura "writing formed with letters".

“A performance, in the performing arts, generally comprises an event in which a performer or group of performers present one or more works of art to an audience.”

although some definitions includespoken or sung texts.” Literature is the worlds that crate by man and try to show how they feel or what they crate. Mostly literature is wrote on paper and the only way to achieve the information is to read. But when you see a show, a play, and then read the novel they are very similar. A performing art is mostly change and rewrote form a novel or a strip and when it preform, the actors will act a bit different every time. But as a novel people may feel different every time but the novel still the same novel, the information are hide in there and makes different people fell different.

Literate may crate later then performing start. We still know how people dance and pray for the victory of a war or the bumper of a year. They performing what we called “nature culture” now. And those performing was the base of literature and the performance today. When human start to wrote, it show the language and how they think. It was the first time they remember history form words not the sound form the older, they wrote hero story, they wrote about the god and the nature. They marked what they should adore and what they should hate. And after all the story about the war and the god, people remembers them and they find out it was only the outline, they start to think, to crate and to wrote again. They made the story become integrated, which made the reader could think that the hero was the real man. Things getting better.

But not everyone had the ability to read that time. The language was weak, the air of that age are full of dist and blood. A warrior was way more important then a author, but they also want to know about the hero, the victory story and the god. So people acted, they performed what was once only the word on the paper, what was once only ink and chirography. The performance once again became the way that makes people remember and think. They base on each other, the actor learn form the novel and the chirography and the inks. They choose to add the movement in and let those people who can not read or write enjoy the same as those educated people do. 

When education become a normal thing in human society, people start to call the warriors as soldiers, they start to getting busy and use their brine more commonly. They lost their time to enjoy a book. So they spend two hour to watch a play, a perform instead of reading. Every age people are reading and performing at the same time. They base on the culture and recreate by the human again and again which seem to make them different form each other, but they may be as same as when they were crated.

A script is obviously less then a play while production is more.

A script may simple or could be change able, but it should be the base of the whole play. However the production which reflects how the actor did or how the audience react from the play. It may different every time and easily influenced by the mod of actors and the audience. So I am disagree about this and the script should be more important then the production. 

blog 1

                                                         About my self

My name is jack Shi, I am a high school student. It’s my third year in high school and I want to introduce myself as the first blogging of my junior year. As a high school student the first goal of mine is got the offers of those collage I want to go to, which I have already made a lone list which been thought many changing and delete. But this goal is not the only thing I need to do in my high school life. I still want to try something that I never before. Like I tied fencing which was a sport that I never heard or seen before. 

People always has different identity, this is what makes people different and make them alike each other at the same time. A high school student should not become the only identity in my high school life, I am also a friend, a performer, a “important” stage crew, a family member and a boyfriend. Those identities makes me learn to take responsibility and also be realistic. There always some people will say that be realistic is not a good thing, even that was a bad thing. But I define the realistic as “stop dreaming but keep hope.” I learned to set my goals in some place that I am able to touch in a hard way. I may talking a lot about every identity I may have, but my point was this is what I think as a thinker.

The first I be in involvement in drama was last years’s fall, I become a stage crew who was an apprentice of Jack Jack, I did learned a lot form him and the play. I know a stage crew is also import

ant in a show. I lucky also be join as a  part of the show by control some mechanical device.

I assume that I could be a good friend. As a friend I will try my best to be reliable and honest. Sometime the truth that I obtain may be hurt but they still have the right to know the truth. A friend also will they their best to support on his friends to do something right and stop them form mistakes. I may not foresee something that happened in the future but I still want to give them the idea what I assume will happened and how should we do something right.

A athlete is something that I am not good at although I did my best on every thing I tied. I may say I am a bit lazy or week on the body level. I am a fencer in my high school and I think this was what I did best. I love sports when I was a kid, but as I grow up I was most interesting in something which is more gentle and quiet. That makes my life keeping sports away form few years. And now I will try my best to pick up what I had left behind. 

As a family member, a son, in my family I am the first kid who study aboard although my grandparents were came back form Russia. They give me their experience and teach me the knowledge what they once learned and they all hope me to matriculate into a good collage. 

So according all those are my rolls and what I did or once missed in my life. As a realistic person, this is all I want to introduce about myself.